.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

 

Why Americans Should Support Right of Return for Palestinians

crossposted at Daily Kos

At the Doha Debates sponsored by BBC World, eighty-two percent of the audience rejected the motion: 'This House believes the Palestinians should give up their full right of return.' Arguing against the motion were Ali Abunimeh, son of Palstinian refugees, and Ilan Pappe, Israeli historian. Abunimeh and Bassem Eid, Palestinian refugee and human rights worker, who argued in favor of the motion, continued the debate in a series of e-mail exchanges published in the UK Guardian's Comment is Free. Abunimeh wrote to Eid,

I really hope you will join us and join the growing movement that understands
that peace will only come in a decolonised Palestine where Israelis and
Palestinians have equal rights regardless of race, religion, ethnicity or any
other arbitrary characteristics.

Eid's points, reiterated in the Guardian story, were hardly arguments, mainly the lamentations of a man in the grips of despair. As Abunimeh commented, it was easy to see why he lost.


When the UN recommended partition of Palestine in 1947, forty-eight percent of the population in the area designated for the Jewish state was Palestinian. According to Dr. Salman Abu Sitta,
Palestinian researcher and refugee expert, himself a refugee from Ain El Sitta in Beersheeba,

Ben Gurion, in his tactical plan to provisionally accept the Partition
Plan, proceeded immediately to ethnically cleanse the coastal plain from the
Palestinian 'citizens' of his new state.

Ben Gurion depopulated 250 villages and expelled half the total refugees
before the state of Israel was declared on 15 May 1948 and before any Arab
regular soldier came to reverse the ethnic cleansing.


Today seventy-five percent of Palestinians are refugees, "their movable and immovable property confiscated by Israel."

And while Americans are intransigent regarding the right of return of Palestine's refugees, Americans backed the return of Bosnia's refugees in 1998. Madeleine Albright spoke movingly to the returnees:

And what we need to remember today is that you are not coming home to invent
something new; you are certainly not coming home to lead lives that have been
designed for you by outsiders. You are coming to reclaim your lives and to
assert your identity. You are coming to take back what you had before.


On the contrary, rather than "reclaiming" lives, Israel's policies to ensure majority Jewish demographics, disrupt Palestinian lives in ways which South Africa's apartheid policy rejected.
Consider the law "which denies Palestinian citizens of Israel the right to acquire any status in Israel for their Palestinian spouses from the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) solely on the basis of their national belonging." This law "violates right to a family life" for thousands of
Palestinian citizens of Israel and their spouses in the occupied territories.

Demographics appears to be one of the main reasons for Israel's opposition to right of return and right of movement for Palestinians in historic Palestine. Israelis, determined to maintain majority Jewish demographics, split hairs regarding the word "should" of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194. It is an effort in vain.

By 1948, the right of return had already gained customary status under
international law.

Therefore, implementation of the right of return in 1948 was in any case
mandatory upon all states, regardless of the use of the word "should" or the
fact that the resolution was issued by the General Assembly. Moreover,
Resolution 194 has never been annulled, repealed, diluted or overturned in any
way. On the contrary, Resolution 194 has been reaffirmed annually by the
United Nations every year since it was initially passed in 1948.

In addition, for those who would presume to "negotiate" away the right of return, it is according to legal experts "a logical necessity for a just and legal peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, under international law."

Madeleine Albright spoke about houses "built on rubble," and the difficult lot for Bosnia's returning refugees. "It is precisely because what you are doing is hard that I wanted to come here to stand with you and salute you."

Very few people "stand and salute" the Palestinian refugees. They are perhaps one of the most 'vilified' groups of people on earth, bombed and massacred in their refugee camps, irrelevant to Israelis, irrelevant to those Palestinians banking on, as Abunimeh mentions, to reign in a little Palestinian statelet.

However, they are not irrelevant to Dr. Abu Sitta, who has devoted his resources and his energy on their behalf. "Israel wants to continue its ethnic cleansing, pursue its racist and Apartheid policies, and does not 'really want to live in peace' with the Palestinians but instead of them," he writes. "To speak of a demographic threat is pure racism."

The Palestinian refugees should not be irrelevant to American citizens who support international law, democracy, justice and equal rights for all. What would we say about someone who lamented that California's demographics will go from a "white" majority to a "Mexican" majority in the near future? How can we condone that a country, under the guise of filtering out terrorists, but really concerned about maintaining a Jewish demographic majority, destines families to live apart? Indeed, how far will Israelis go to ensure that Israel maintains a Jewish majority?

For those who maintain that Palestinians may return to a Palestinian state, I offer the following. I work overseas. Every other year I return to my late father and mother's home. I am not asked to return to Los Angeles, one hundred miles away from my home, nor am I importuned to return to Northern California, in lieu of Central California, which I consider home. We should not expect Palestinians to accept return to a Palestinian state in place of their ancestral home.

Comments:
Jews are campiaging for compensation for land they lost to germany in WW2. So if they can ask for compensation, we most certainly ask for our right to return as well. I find it annoying how everyone says that holding on to such an ideal its crazy; I beg to differ...the right of return is the only thing we have left.
 
And Jews have been compensated for property. Someone just got over one hundred million for property that Karstadt Department Store is on in Berlin. The time is now for publicizing right of return. I will never concede, nor could I concede or negotiate an "inalienable" right. Anyone who says otherwise is full of him or herself or else at the point of despair, which is pitiful.
 
I've registered at the DK site in order to get some support for your piece going, but alas, I have to be kept in quarantine for 24 hours... I do find it funny that the classic way to handle such a point of view is for them to say, "well when the Americans give back land to the Indians"... the thing is, yes, there should be redress of some sort for indigenous people of that continent, but on the other hand, this is no excuse to negate the same to Palestinians who are living as refugees. It is a bit of simply humanistic thinking that is beyond these people.

I personally believe that the issue of ROR is still very foreign to all Americans. It is just something that they do not even consider, they don't know about it! I congratulate you for trying to make a dent in this. I believe that the US public is ill-informed, apathetic, and like you say, full of themselves. This is just the sad truth.

I think it has something to do with the American religion....
 
Support will be welcome. There is a positive change in the US and I think it's important to build on the momentum . . . a fabulous feature in the San Francisco Chronicle on a Palestinian family (in the food section); op-eds in mainstream papers by Ali Abunimeh, Joseph Massad, and Saree Makdisi, and the recent op-ed by Robert Novak.
 
I agree that Americans Should Support Right of Return for Palestinians to a future State of Palestine.I think even Israel would agree to that eventually when there is Peace between Palestinians and Israel.

As One Voice and Al Quds President Sari Nussebeh says:"I believe the Palestinians should recognize that the refugees should return to a Palestinian state, enabling them to build a new life" "We must exchange the old Palestinian dream for a new one, for the sake of the future," Nusseibeh said
 
Salam, Umkahlil

Peace and blessings be unto you.

DK is a good forum. While DK has not allowed members to delete the articles of other members it has allowed them to delete their comments in the past. Don’t let the “recipe comments” by the WUJS that follow all who address Palestine bother you, Palestine has many friends at DK.

Check out http://rankings.big-boards.com/?sort=members

And this … http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230 The first part about false flag operations is fascinating. It has been viewed almost 800,000 times.


Palestine Forever
 
Thank you, Palestine Forever

I am not deterred by the Zionists at DailyKos; I think that it is an excellent forum for educating Americans about Palestine, which is what I can do in my position. Thanks for the links.
 
I finally got in there and able to post... at the end of a debate, it's hard to pick up the argument again. They sure give new members a rough time before they can post! Waiting is not nice!
 
Umkahlil,

A fanatical Zionist has changed the tags of the diary you posted at dailykos so that it can't be found by clicking on the Israel tag and becomes hard to find. Change the tag back and contact management. They can track who changed the tag and hopefully ban whoever did it; I've seen kos ban people on the spot for tag abuse.

Great diary, much appreciated, and keep up the good work!
 
Thanks, Noah. The "revisionism" tag is gone; someone must have taken it out before I did. Thank you very much for noticing; I'll notify management, also.
 
You're welcome. The change was "troll diary", and when I went back yes someone had changed the tags back to Israel, Palestine (if that was what was there originally, I didn't notice}. I don't post much there anymore, and hence have lost TU status, which allows one to change tags.

Just DO NOT let them intimidate you. You scare them because you speak the truth.

Cheers
 
Well, please start posting again. It is a valuable way to get the message across to a number of people. We need more and more articulate people writing on behalf of the Palestinians. What name did you post under there?
 
nice blog - i've been following for a while, but finally linked you to my own... i'll be frequenting your posts.

_kris
 
jews owe at least $10 trillion to palestinians. this $10 trillion does not buy jews any property, land, forgiveness. this amount is for jewish lies.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Palestine Blogs - The Gazette